The best AI agent for marketing teams
By Marcell Havlik, founder of TODO for AI · Updated
You own pipeline and content, and engineering time is never yours. You want the post published and the ad live, in your own accounts, not pasted back to you. Here is how 15 tools score against what this job actually needs, and where each one fits.
Key takeaways
- Top pick. TODO for AI ranks first of 15 AI agents for marketing teams, at 99% fit, followed by Notion (66%) and ClickUp (63%).
- What decides it. For marketing teams the ranking weights beyond code and long-running work highest, and tools that cannot do the core job are not ranked at all (15 left out).
- Models. TODO for AI runs any provider, Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok or a local Ollama model, on one plan. Pricing: free plan (Claude Sonnet only), then Starter $20, Pro $100 or Ultra $200 a month with any provider included.
- Benchmark. TODO for AI scored 89.9% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 with Opus 5.5 (high) (own harness, 80/89 tasks, 2026-10-08; not an official leaderboard submission).
- Not for you if. If you only need drafting and ideation, ChatGPT at $20 is the better value and you should not overthink it. The case for an agent starts when you want the output shipped rather than pasted.
What marketing teams actually need done
Marketing is where the "AI agent" label is most oversold. Most tools sold to marketers generate text and stop, leaving the actual work, the publishing, the account changes, the follow-up, exactly where it was. The bottleneck was never drafting.
This ranking weights reach beyond code above everything, then unattended scheduling. The question each tool is judged on is simple: after it writes the thing, can it also put the thing live?
Landing pages, programmatic SEO, schema and sitemaps, shipped rather than queued behind a sprint.
Ads, social, email sequences, CRM updates, in the tools you already pay for.
Pull the numbers from analytics and the ad platforms on a schedule, not by hand on the last Friday.
Output that sounds like you, not like a language model with a thesaurus.
Scored for marketing teams
| Rank | Tool | Fit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |  TODO for AIYou own pipeline and content, and engineering time is never yours. You want the post published and the ad live, in your own accounts, not pasted back to you. | 99% |
| 2 |  NotionTeams whose work already lives in Notion and who want agents to maintain it. | 66% |
| 3 |  ClickUpTeams already running ClickUp who want agents inside their existing boards. | 63% |
| 4 |  LindyOps and go-to-market teams automating repeatable processes without writing code. | 63% |
| 5 |  AsanaOperations teams who want repeatable intake and routing automated inside Asana. | 59% |
| 6 |  Copilot CoworkCompanies already standardised on Microsoft 365 who want an agent inside Outlook, Teams and Office. | 59% |
| 7 |  MakeTeams who want Zapier-style automation with more control and a lower per-run cost. | 59% |
| 8 |  Claude CoworkClaude subscribers who want autonomous document, research and browser work without leaving Anthropic. | 57% |
| 9 |  GumloopMarketing and ops teams automating AI-heavy research, enrichment and content pipelines. | 56% |
| 10 |  ZapierConnecting SaaS tools with reliable trigger-to-action plumbing. | 54% |
| 11 |  ManusPeople who want polished research, decks, sites or short videos from one prompt, mostly in a vendor cloud. | 53% |
| 12 |  monday.comTeams already running monday boards who want agents acting on those boards. | 53% |
| 13 |  AirtableTeams whose work is structured records and who want internal apps and agents on top of them. | 50% |
| 14 |  ChatGPTAnyone who wants one excellent assistant for research, writing and everyday questions. | 49% |
| 15 |  Claude CodeDevelopers whose work lives in a repo and who are all-in on Anthropic models. | 47% |
How we weighted it
Every tool carries one set of scores across 6 dimensions, used on every page of this site. A page for marketing teams does not rewrite those scores, it weights them. Here is every weight, including the ones turned down:
A tool is only ranked here if it can execute in business systems (ads, CRM, inbox, CMS) and be used without a command line. Writing the copy is not the bottleneck; publishing it is. Not ranked here: OpenAI Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Cline, Aider, OpenHands, Lovable, Base44, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Linear, GitHub Copilot, n8n, Motion, Trello.
We build one of these tools, so treat this as an editorial argument rather than a measured verdict. The weights are all above and each tool's underlying scores are on its own comparison page, precisely so you can disagree with them.
The others worth knowing
The docs-and-databases workspace, with Custom Agents that run on schedules and triggers inside it.
All-in-one work platform whose Super Agents can be @mentioned and assigned tasks like teammates.
No-code AI teammates for business workflows: email, CRM, meetings and support, built from triggers and steps.
Work management with assignable AI Teammates, Dash, and a no-code studio for cross-system workflows.