Comparison · Paul Gauthier · verified 2026-09-15

TODO for AI
vs Aider

The original open-source pair-programming CLI, git-native, any model. Here is where each one wins, with numbers, and who should pick which.

InterfaceTerminalWeb, desktop, CLI, voice
ModelsAny provider (BYOK)Every provider
SourceOpenEdge + CLI public
Starts atFreeFree
Facts verified 2026-09-15. Pricing is public list price.
Every vendor
models, vs any provider (byok)
Your machines
PC, cloud VM, real Chrome
Any CLI
is an integration, not just MCP
Free
from, vs Free
Architecture at a glance
Aider
Models
AnthropicOpenAIGoogleAny provider (BYOK)
Runs in
Terminal
Where it lives
Your laptop, while open
Produces
Code
PRs
SEO
Email
Ads
TODO for AI
Models
AnthropicOpenAIGooglexAIDeepSeekEvery provider
CROSS-VENDOR REVIEW
Runs in
Your PC
Cloud VM
Real Chrome
Voice
Where it lives
Always-on cloud VM · vault · your logins
Produces
Code
SEO
Email
Ads
Social
CRM
Struck-through outputs are outside Aider's scope. TODO for AI runs the same models plus the rest, from a machine that stays on.
The short version

Who should pick which

Choose Aider if
  • You want a minimal, scriptable CLI
  • You want to watch every edit as it happens
Choose TODO for AI if
  • You want to delegate, not pair
  • You want browser and business tools in the same agent
  • You want a managed cloud machine
Context

What Aider is, and where it stops

Aider is the original open-source AI pair programmer and still one of the most token-efficient. It is git-native, works with any model, and is scriptable from the shell. Many developers who dislike "agents" like Aider precisely because it does one edit at a time and shows its work.

That is the point and the limit. Aider pairs, it does not delegate. You are in the loop for every step, there is no browser, no cloud, no scheduling, and it is strictly about code.

Developers who want a lightweight, transparent CLI pair programmer.
Why people switch

Three reasons Aider users look elsewhere

01
You drive every step

Aider waits for you. It does not take a task and come back with the result.

02
Terminal and repo only

No browser, no business tools, no persistent machine.

03
No team layer

Per-developer keys and per-developer bills.

Scores

Six dimensions that decide it

Six dimensions, 0 to 5
AiderTODO for AI
Model freedom5 · 5
Which vendors and models you can run
Long-running work1 · 5
Persistent machine, scheduling, parallel tasks
Beyond code1 · 5
Marketing, ops, browser, email, not only repos
Openness5 · 4
Source available, self-host, extend
Team & permissions1 · 4
Roles, pooled usage, tool approvals
Cost predictability3 · 5
Flat plan vs metered tokens
Feature by feature

What each one ships

FeatureAiderTODO for AI
Persistent cloud VM
An always-on machine. Files, logins and sessions survive between runs.
Model choice
Any (BYOK)
Any provider
Cross-vendor review
Review GPT output with Claude, or the other way around.
Drives your real browser
Chrome extension plus cloud browsers.
Business tasks, not only code
SEO, email, ads, social, CRM via CLI tools.
Any CLI as an integration
Scripts
Any binary
Voice control
Team roles, pooled usage
Roles + pooled
Tool permissions
Basic
Allow, approve, block
Open runtime
Edge + CLI public
Pricing

What it costs

Aider
Free

Free, Apache 2.0. Tokens billed by your provider.

TODO for AI
Free

Hobby free (Sonnet only), Starter $20, Pro $100, Ultra $200. Paid plans include every model from every vendor.

Verdict

Bottom line

Our take
Aider for careful, transparent pair programming. TODO for AI for handing over whole tasks, code or not, and getting them back done.