Alternatives · Anysphere

11 best Cursor alternatives in 2026

A VS Code fork with built-in AI chat, tab completion and background agents. Below: what to switch to, scored on the six things that matter, and an honest word on when to stay.

11
tools compared
4
fully open source
6
with a free tier
2026-09-15
last verified
Architecture at a glance
Cursor
Models
AnthropicOpenAIGoogleMulti-vendor, metered
Runs in
IDE
Where it lives
Your laptop, while open
Produces
Code
PRs
SEO
Email
Ads
TODO for AI
Models
AnthropicOpenAIGooglexAIDeepSeekEvery provider
CROSS-VENDOR REVIEW
Runs in
Your PC
Cloud VM
Real Chrome
Voice
Where it lives
Always-on cloud VM · vault · your logins
Produces
Code
SEO
Email
Ads
Social
CRM
Struck-through outputs are outside Cursor's scope. TODO for AI runs the same models plus the rest, from a machine that stays on.
Context

Why people look past Cursor

Cursor is the editor most AI-native teams type in. The tab completion and inline edits are the best in the category, it supports models from every vendor, and it feels like VS Code because it is VS Code. Background agents exist, but the product is built around a human in the editor, accepting suggestions as they appear.

That is a different job from delegating. Cursor is at its best when you are present. It is not built to run for two hours while your laptop is closed, to drive your browser, or to handle anything that is not source code. And with frontier models metered on top of the subscription, heavy agent usage makes the monthly bill hard to predict.

01
You are the runtime

The agent works while the editor is open and you are watching. Close the lid and it stops.

02
Metered frontier usage

The $20 covers a quota; real agentic work on Opus or GPT-5.6 is billed on top.

03
Editor only

No browser, no email, no marketing or ops tooling. Everything outside the repo is someone else's problem.

At a glance

All options in one table

ToolInterfaceModelsOpenFromScore
TODO for AIWeb, desktop, CLI, voiceEvery providerPartlyFree28
OpenHandsWeb, CLIAny providerYesFree (self-host)22
AiderTerminalAny provider (BYOK)YesFree16
LindyWeb builderMost major models, you pickNo$30/mo16
OpenCodeTerminalAny provider (BYOK)YesFree15
ClineIDE extensionAny provider (BYOK)YesFree15
OpenAI CodexTerminal, ChatGPT web, IDEOpenAI onlyPartly$8/mo14
Claude CoworkClaude Desktop, web, mobile, Chrome side panelAnthropic onlyNo$20/mo14
ChatGPTWeb, desktop, mobileOpenAI onlyNoFree12
Claude CodeTerminal, IDE extensionsAnthropic onlyNo$20/mo11
ManusWebVendor-selectedNo$20/mo11
Cursor (baseline)IDEMulti-vendor, meteredNo$20/mo13
Method

How we scored

Each tool gets 0 to 5 on six dimensions: model freedom, long-running work, beyond code, openness, team & permissions, cost predictability. The sum is the score in the table. Facts (pricing, interface, models, licence) were checked against each vendor's public pages on 2026-09-15.

The ratings are ours, and we are on the list, so weigh them accordingly. Every fact behind a rating is checkable, and where a competitor is the better pick for a job we say so in its card.

The list

Each alternative, honestly

1 · Our pick

TODO for AI

28/30

Every model from every vendor on one flat plan, a persistent cloud VM, your real Chrome, and CLI tools for marketing, SEO, email and ops. 82% on Terminal-Bench 2.1.

Pick it if
  • + You want to delegate whole tasks and walk away
  • + You want work running while your laptop is closed
  • + You need the agent in Chrome, email and ad accounts, not only in the repo
Skip it if
  • - You want autocomplete and inline edits while you type
  • - You never leave VS Code
2 · coding agent

OpenHands

22/30

Open-source autonomous software agent with a self-hosted or cloud workspace.

  • + Open source
  • + Sandboxed workspace per task
  • + Multi-model
  • - Focused on software tasks
  • - Self-hosting is real ops work
  • - No real-browser or business integrations
Best for Teams that want an open, self-hosted autonomous coding agent.Free (self-host)
3 · coding agent

Aider

16/30

The original open-source pair-programming CLI, git-native, any model.

  • + Very token efficient
  • + Git-native commits
  • + Runs anywhere Python runs
  • - Pair-programming, not autonomous: you drive each step
  • - No browser, no cloud, no scheduling
  • - Code-only
Best for Developers who want a lightweight, transparent CLI pair programmer.Free
4 · general agent

Lindy

16/30

No-code AI teammates for business workflows: email, CRM, meetings and support, built from triggers and steps.

  • + The strongest no-code builder here for business workflows
  • + Large catalogue of triggers and app integrations
  • + You pick the model per task, and computer use is included
  • + Credits pool across the whole workspace
  • - Built around defined workflows rather than open-ended work
  • - Credits are an abstraction, and the rate changes per plan
  • - Lives in its own cloud: no shell on your machine, no repo
  • - Closed source
Best for Ops and go-to-market teams automating repeatable processes without writing code.$30/mo
5 · coding agent

OpenCode

15/30

Open-source terminal coding agent, bring your own keys, any provider.

  • + Fully open source
  • + Any model via your own keys
  • + Fast terminal UI
  • - Pay-per-token bills you have to track yourself
  • - No cloud machine, no scheduling, no team features
  • - Code-only
Best for Developers who want a free, hackable terminal agent and already hold API keys.Free
6 · ide

Cline

15/30

Open-source VS Code agent extension, bring your own keys, plan and act modes.

  • + Open source
  • + Any model
  • + Good MCP support
  • - Runs only while VS Code is open
  • - Token bills add up fast on frontier models
  • - Code-only
Best for VS Code users who want an open agent with their own keys.Free
7 · coding agent

OpenAI Codex

14/30

OpenAI's coding agent: an open-source CLI plus a cloud sandbox inside ChatGPT.

  • + Strong token efficiency on GPT-5.6
  • + CLI is open source
  • + Cloud tasks run in parallel from the ChatGPT UI
  • - OpenAI models only
  • - Cloud sandbox is ephemeral and repo-scoped
  • - No browser automation, no business tooling
Best for Teams already on ChatGPT Plus or Pro who want GPT-native coding.$8/mo
8 · general agent

Claude Cowork

14/30

Anthropic's agentic mode: hand Claude a multi-step task and it works on its own, including scheduled runs in the cloud.

  • + Real autonomy on multi-step work, with scheduled runs on Anthropic's servers
  • + Built-in browser automation plus Claude in Chrome
  • + Claude-grade output quality
  • + Included on every paid plan, no extra tool to buy
  • - Anthropic models only, so no second model checks the first
  • - Runs in Anthropic's sandbox, not on your own machine or in your repo
  • - Extends through MCP connectors rather than any CLI you install
  • - Closed source
Best for Claude subscribers who want autonomous document, research and browser work without leaving Anthropic.$20/mo
9 · general agent

ChatGPT

12/30

The default AI assistant, with agent mode, deep research and connectors bolted onto the chat product.

  • + The best general assistant for everyday questions
  • + Deep research and agent mode are genuinely good
  • + Connectors into Drive, email and calendars
  • + A usable free tier, and the cheapest paid entry at $8
  • - OpenAI models only
  • - Caps are per feature, so you hit a wall in one place while credit sits unused in another
  • - Agent mode runs in OpenAI's sandbox, not on your machine or in your repo
  • - No shell on your machine, no CLI tools, and its browser is not your logged-in Chrome profile
Best for Anyone who wants one excellent assistant for research, writing and everyday questions.Free
10 · coding agent

Claude Code

11/30

Anthropic's terminal coding agent, tied to Claude models and Claude subscription tiers.

  • + Excellent code quality on Opus and Sonnet
  • + Mature terminal UX, hooks, subagents
  • + Chrome extension for browser tasks
  • - Anthropic models only, no second opinion
  • - No hosted machine: persistence is whatever box you run it on
  • - Built for repos, not for marketing, email or ops workflows
  • - Closed source
Best for Developers who live in the terminal and are all-in on Anthropic models.$20/mo
11 · general agent

Manus

11/30

A general-purpose cloud agent that browses, researches and produces documents.

  • + Good at research and document generation
  • + Cloud browser built in
  • + No setup
  • - No access to your own machine or repos
  • - Credit pricing is hard to predict
  • - You do not choose the model
  • - Closed
Best for Non-technical users who want one-off research and slide decks.$20/mo
Decision guide

How to choose

Every model, one flat plan, a machine that stays onTODO for AI
Fully open source, bring your own keysOpenHands, Aider, OpenCode
AI inside the editor while you typeCline
Self-hosted autonomous coding agentOpenHands
An everyday assistant for chat, writing and researchChatGPT, Manus
Autonomous work without leaving one vendorClaude Cowork
No-code builder for repeatable business workflowsLindy
Our take
Cursor and TODO for AI are complementary more than competitive: keep Cursor for typing, hand the long or non-code tasks to TODO for AI. If you have to pick one and you delegate more than you type, pick TODO for AI.
FAQ

Common questions

What is the best Cursor alternative?
TODO for AI if you want every model, an always-on cloud machine and business tasks in one agent. OpenHands if you want teams that want an open, self-hosted autonomous coding agent.
Is there a free Cursor alternative?
TODO for AI has a free Hobby plan. OpenHands, Aider, OpenCode, Cline are free tools where you bring your own API keys and pay per token.
Is there an open-source Cursor alternative?
OpenHands, Aider, OpenCode, Cline are fully open source. TODO for AI publishes its edge runtime and CLI.
Can I use TODO for AI together with Cursor?
Yes. Keep Cursor for typing and hand long tasks to TODO for AI. The CLI and desktop app work next to any editor.